Case report
On August 7, the Longwan District People's Court of Wenzhou City delivered a criminal judgment to the Integrity Supervision Department of the Board of Directors of Tsingshan Industrial in accordance with the law regarding the case of Meng Moujun, Wu Mouquan, and Cheng Mou committing the crime of job embezzlement.
?
?
The document states that the court found after trial: From January to October 2023, while serving as the squad leader of the ordering center of the logistics department of a company in the Weda Bay Industrial Park in Indonesia, the defendant Meng Moujun had an affair with the defendants Wu Mouquan and Cheng Mou Yang and others conspired in advance to take advantage of Meng's position to modify the meal delivery data in the system and misappropriate the inflated meals. The misappropriated meals were handed over to Wu Quan, Cheng, Yang Han and others for use, and the meals were settled at a price far lower than the market price. The above three people paid the money to Meng Jun. According to statistics, defendant Meng Moujun was involved in misappropriating assets of 1,100,440 yuan (the same below) and illegal profits of 345,137 yuan; defendant Wu Mouquan was involved in misappropriating assets of 447,455 yuan; defendant Cheng was involved in misappropriating assets of 557,727 yuan.
?
(Pictures come from the Internet)
The court held that the defendant Meng Moujun took advantage of his position to illegally possess the property of his unit together with the defendants Wu Mouquan, Cheng Mou and others. All three of them had committed the crime of official embezzlement. In view of the statutory mitigating, mitigating and lenient circumstances of the three persons, such as surrendering or confessing, pleading guilty and accepting punishment, actively refunding compensation and obtaining the understanding of the victim unit, the three persons were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from one to two years and approved. Suspended sentence applies.
?
In addition, Yang Han, as one of the persons involved in this case, although he participated in the job embezzlement behavior of Meng Moujun and others, due to the minor nature of his crime, he was able to actively cooperate with the investigation and actively refund compensation after the incident. After communication and coordination with the department, , the public prosecution organ made a decision not to prosecute him in accordance with the law.
?
It is better to be innocent and to be self-disciplined! The occurrence of this case is undoubtedly a profound lesson and painful cost for the company or the parties concerned. I hope that the majority of Tsingshan people can take this as a warning, keep in mind the requirements of "dare to be the first, be honest and dedicated", be clean and conscientious, and ultimately have a clear conscience.